<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Windows 7 The Best Windows Ever?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/</link>
	<description>technology reviews and opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 07:29:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrik</title>
		<link>http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/comment-page-2/#comment-2055</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Henrik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/#comment-2055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that there is no doubt in mind, that Windows 7 is by far the most superior operating system from Microsoft ever.

The speed and agility of the system is impressive compared to Vista and it beats Windows XPs boring GUI every day.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that there is no doubt in mind, that Windows 7 is by far the most superior operating system from Microsoft ever.</p>
<p>The speed and agility of the system is impressive compared to Vista and it beats Windows XPs boring GUI every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/comment-page-2/#comment-2054</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[guest]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/#comment-2054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No matter how many big or little modifications Microsoft may make to its OS it still remains at the end of the day the same basic architecture. The inherent design flaws are still there. Only a complete start-over will ever produce a better system, and that, as long as there is still a &quot;buggy-whip&quot; buyer will never happen. The same is true of Mac, although its architecture is more interesting and clever. However, as long as Mac still holds the hardware captive, it will always come in &quot;second&quot; in the only game that matters: profits. Linux is frankly the only logical, practical solution for the rest of the world: it is &quot;OPEN,&quot; free, and makes good use of standard, inexpensive hardware.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter how many big or little modifications Microsoft may make to its OS it still remains at the end of the day the same basic architecture. The inherent design flaws are still there. Only a complete start-over will ever produce a better system, and that, as long as there is still a &quot;buggy-whip&quot; buyer will never happen. The same is true of Mac, although its architecture is more interesting and clever. However, as long as Mac still holds the hardware captive, it will always come in &quot;second&quot; in the only game that matters: profits. Linux is frankly the only logical, practical solution for the rest of the world: it is &quot;OPEN,&quot; free, and makes good use of standard, inexpensive hardware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Essay On Tech Coverage Status Quo &#124; IT Support W1 London</title>
		<link>http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/comment-page-2/#comment-2053</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[An Essay On Tech Coverage Status Quo &#124; IT Support W1 London]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 13:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/#comment-2053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that, other ‘dudes with blogs’ will follow up on both sides of the argument with articles that appear more balanced, and a few of them will get to Digg. As the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that, other ‘dudes with blogs’ will follow up on both sides of the argument with articles that appear more balanced, and a few of them will get to Digg. As the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goat</title>
		<link>http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-2052</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[goat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/#comment-2052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yup its not meant to be stable because its commercial..   because when making an os you don&#039;t worry about it being stable or safe if its commercial. Also Mac OS is not commercial at all. nope. and your not buttfucking stupid either.. &lt; /sarcasm&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yup its not meant to be stable because its commercial..   because when making an os you don&#039;t worry about it being stable or safe if its commercial. Also Mac OS is not commercial at all. nope. and your not buttfucking stupid either.. &lt; /sarcasm&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mountext</title>
		<link>http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/comment-page-2/#comment-2051</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mountext]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 06:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/#comment-2051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I  WAS about to make an intelligent comment, then I saw the level of intelligence on this blog. Not just this article, but practically every one of them.

Anyway, let&#039;s just say, having tried it, I&#039;d recommend windows 7 to everyone who still needs to use Windows. I myself don&#039;t see the need to, and am glad I won&#039;t have to pirate it or pay for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  WAS about to make an intelligent comment, then I saw the level of intelligence on this blog. Not just this article, but practically every one of them.</p>
<p>Anyway, let&#039;s just say, having tried it, I&#039;d recommend windows 7 to everyone who still needs to use Windows. I myself don&#039;t see the need to, and am glad I won&#039;t have to pirate it or pay for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ursanrazvan</title>
		<link>http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/comment-page-2/#comment-2050</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ursanrazvan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 11:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/#comment-2050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the best thing you could do is to buy that macbook. Why ? Simple: you can still install windows on it, and if windows would let you down you haven&#039;t lost a thing, cuz&#039; you still got macos :D why do I think windows will let you down ? because it is from microsoft, and you cannot put your trust in it.. ok, so you tested windows7 a month or more.. well, talk to me after a year, that is if you haven&#039;t already reinstalled it by then! You will see, windows will let you down, sooner or later. It&#039;s a fact! It&#039;s still on top of Vista, you know...

I went mac, and i cannot go back! It&#039;s like a dream, a paradise.. it&#039;s like a drug! You get more addicted on every startup. You will soon wake up eager to start your mac, even just for watching it! It&#039;s crazy, I&#039;m tellin&#039; ya.. when Bogdan told me how mac can change your life, I thought to myself &quot;what the heck, it&#039;s a *nix system! it cannot be better than a linux, and linux ain&#039;t better than windows xp or 7, so it cannot be better than my precious windows&quot;. Now when I have to start into windows (because of work &amp; school), I&#039;m disgusted and can&#039;t wait to shut that thing down and get back to mac! My god, i&#039;m so addicted to it..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the best thing you could do is to buy that macbook. Why ? Simple: you can still install windows on it, and if windows would let you down you haven&#039;t lost a thing, cuz&#039; you still got macos <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  why do I think windows will let you down ? because it is from microsoft, and you cannot put your trust in it.. ok, so you tested windows7 a month or more.. well, talk to me after a year, that is if you haven&#039;t already reinstalled it by then! You will see, windows will let you down, sooner or later. It&#039;s a fact! It&#039;s still on top of Vista, you know&#8230;</p>
<p>I went mac, and i cannot go back! It&#039;s like a dream, a paradise.. it&#039;s like a drug! You get more addicted on every startup. You will soon wake up eager to start your mac, even just for watching it! It&#039;s crazy, I&#039;m tellin&#039; ya.. when Bogdan told me how mac can change your life, I thought to myself &quot;what the heck, it&#039;s a *nix system! it cannot be better than a linux, and linux ain&#039;t better than windows xp or 7, so it cannot be better than my precious windows&quot;. Now when I have to start into windows (because of work &amp; school), I&#039;m disgusted and can&#039;t wait to shut that thing down and get back to mac! My god, i&#039;m so addicted to it..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azteck2</title>
		<link>http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/comment-page-2/#comment-2049</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[azteck2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/#comment-2049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the last time, macs have 2 button mice standard, in fact they are 4 button mice. Also, macs are not twice as much as PCs! Please get your heads out of the 90&#039;s! As far as which one is better? That depends on the user...period!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the last time, macs have 2 button mice standard, in fact they are 4 button mice. Also, macs are not twice as much as PCs! Please get your heads out of the 90&#039;s! As far as which one is better? That depends on the user&#8230;period!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: applefox</title>
		<link>http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/comment-page-2/#comment-2048</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[applefox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/#comment-2048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows crashes much more often then my ubuntu os. In fact ubuntu has NEVER crashed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows crashes much more often then my ubuntu os. In fact ubuntu has NEVER crashed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beerwulf</title>
		<link>http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/comment-page-2/#comment-2047</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[beerwulf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/#comment-2047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve used just about everything under the sun for the thirty years I&#039;ve been programming for a living, from Radio Shack Model I&#039;s through Osborne luggables and Mac+-&gt;OSX with some sojourns into Windows.  The biggest programming headaches I have ever had were writing font utilities for Windows XP and Vista for several reasons - their anemic font API, their dog&#039;s breakfast registry, their paranoid and ineffective UAC model and their inability to create really top-notch developer tools that didn&#039;t come bundled with a straitjacket.  Lots of this is due to the inherent difficulty of writing software that needs to make an OS work outside of its design parameters but it&#039;s made worse by the fuzziness of Windows&#039; design parameters, avalanche of APIs and the hit-or-miss documentation Microsoft does so well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve used just about everything under the sun for the thirty years I&#039;ve been programming for a living, from Radio Shack Model I&#039;s through Osborne luggables and Mac+-&gt;OSX with some sojourns into Windows.  The biggest programming headaches I have ever had were writing font utilities for Windows XP and Vista for several reasons &#8211; their anemic font API, their dog&#039;s breakfast registry, their paranoid and ineffective UAC model and their inability to create really top-notch developer tools that didn&#039;t come bundled with a straitjacket.  Lots of this is due to the inherent difficulty of writing software that needs to make an OS work outside of its design parameters but it&#039;s made worse by the fuzziness of Windows&#039; design parameters, avalanche of APIs and the hit-or-miss documentation Microsoft does so well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus</title>
		<link>http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-2046</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Markus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/#comment-2046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, and as a result one tends to say words like &quot;stupider&quot; which don&#039;t exist. :). I&#039;m not trying to be mean, just teasing you about. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, and as a result one tends to say words like &quot;stupider&quot; which don&#039;t exist. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> . I&#039;m not trying to be mean, just teasing you about. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kosta</title>
		<link>http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-2045</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kosta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/#comment-2045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Terrible post Florentin, where to start.......   First of all, you said windows was &quot;not meant to be safe&quot;, what respectful software manufacturer would not try to make their product used on computers across the world, including computers in banks, as safe as possible? Im not even going to comment on them not making it safe to promote antivirus software because thats just rediculous.

Your ignorance shines again when you say that windows 7 is going to be better simply because it is the latest windows OS.  Im sure plenty of us prefer XP over Vista due to the smaller demand on system resources.  By the way, can you ellaborate more on this &quot;ram thingy&quot;?
I would love to hear more of your expertise on the subject.  TOOL!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrible post Florentin, where to start&#8230;&#8230;.   First of all, you said windows was &quot;not meant to be safe&quot;, what respectful software manufacturer would not try to make their product used on computers across the world, including computers in banks, as safe as possible? Im not even going to comment on them not making it safe to promote antivirus software because thats just rediculous.</p>
<p>Your ignorance shines again when you say that windows 7 is going to be better simply because it is the latest windows OS.  Im sure plenty of us prefer XP over Vista due to the smaller demand on system resources.  By the way, can you ellaborate more on this &quot;ram thingy&quot;?<br />
I would love to hear more of your expertise on the subject.  TOOL!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sudo</title>
		<link>http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/comment-page-2/#comment-2044</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sudo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/#comment-2044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Come on guys, as long as you have the choice of OS just try out yourself what&#039;s best for you, and be contended with that, when you keep on comparing you will always have your own favorites, which doesn&#039;t necessarily mean the facts. Keep what you prefer and stick with it till you feel the other one is better!

.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on guys, as long as you have the choice of OS just try out yourself what&#039;s best for you, and be contended with that, when you keep on comparing you will always have your own favorites, which doesn&#039;t necessarily mean the facts. Keep what you prefer and stick with it till you feel the other one is better!</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-2043</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 07:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/#comment-2043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How would you uninstall anything else on your Windows PC?  If you wanted to delete a Word file, a picture, a movie, a Photoshop file, or whatever other file, how would you do it?  There&#039;s no uninstall button for those, right?  I&#039;m guessing you would drag it to the recycle bin or right click on the file and click delete?  Macs treat applications just like any other file when it comes to removing them.  Just simply drag them to the trash.  It&#039;s not rocket science.  If you can&#039;t figure that out, how the heck did you figure out how to turn on the damn thing?  I&#039;m pretty sure the power button doesn&#039;t say &quot;ON&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would you uninstall anything else on your Windows PC?  If you wanted to delete a Word file, a picture, a movie, a Photoshop file, or whatever other file, how would you do it?  There&#039;s no uninstall button for those, right?  I&#039;m guessing you would drag it to the recycle bin or right click on the file and click delete?  Macs treat applications just like any other file when it comes to removing them.  Just simply drag them to the trash.  It&#039;s not rocket science.  If you can&#039;t figure that out, how the heck did you figure out how to turn on the damn thing?  I&#039;m pretty sure the power button doesn&#039;t say &quot;ON&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: louis</title>
		<link>http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/comment-page-2/#comment-2042</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[louis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 06:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/#comment-2042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmmmmm..... I wonder why Adobe Photoshop runs faster on Windows 7 installed on my Mac than Mac OS Photoshop version?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmmm&#8230;.. I wonder why Adobe Photoshop runs faster on Windows 7 installed on my Mac than Mac OS Photoshop version?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wendell</title>
		<link>http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/comment-page-2/#comment-2041</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wendell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/#comment-2041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i think the illusion is your understanding of simple math and common sense.

my company has saved over $820 per month over the last eight years (nine years in September); that more than makes up for the increase in unit costs for the computers.  take into account that many of the enterprise level software we use are cheaper on the osx platform, we don&#039;t have to worry about running virus programs and countless other issues that are built into apple computers; we&#039;re way ahead. consider that things rarely go wrong and i don&#039;t have people with twittling their thumbs doing nothing while a pc tech support guy either removes the ibm machine from our office or causes my employee to be down for an hour and a half.  there&#039;s a cost for that my friend and i pay for it.

as far as costs are concerned; we priced out a dell server two years ago that cost over $1200 more than a similarly equipped apple machine.  i agree that apple costs more in most situations but you have to appreciate that you get what you pay for. apple machines come ready and there&#039;s less work to do in future.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the illusion is your understanding of simple math and common sense.</p>
<p>my company has saved over $820 per month over the last eight years (nine years in September); that more than makes up for the increase in unit costs for the computers.  take into account that many of the enterprise level software we use are cheaper on the osx platform, we don&#039;t have to worry about running virus programs and countless other issues that are built into apple computers; we&#039;re way ahead. consider that things rarely go wrong and i don&#039;t have people with twittling their thumbs doing nothing while a pc tech support guy either removes the ibm machine from our office or causes my employee to be down for an hour and a half.  there&#039;s a cost for that my friend and i pay for it.</p>
<p>as far as costs are concerned; we priced out a dell server two years ago that cost over $1200 more than a similarly equipped apple machine.  i agree that apple costs more in most situations but you have to appreciate that you get what you pay for. apple machines come ready and there&#039;s less work to do in future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harrier</title>
		<link>http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/comment-page-2/#comment-2040</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harrier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/#comment-2040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I appreciate Justins opinion.  As a life time PC user, I was forced to use a Mac out of desperation when my Dell broke down after just 4 years.  When I tried using Vista, nothing worked period.  It was worse than a paperweight because it was too large.  During the Vista fiasco, I recall MS insisting only 50% of the people using it were having problems an that only 500MB of RAM was needed to run it.  When I got it, It took me no time to realize the OS was lousy and all my friends were looking at me for solutions.  You&#039;re talking to a guy who was hard core microsoft all the way and never thought about a Mac.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate Justins opinion.  As a life time PC user, I was forced to use a Mac out of desperation when my Dell broke down after just 4 years.  When I tried using Vista, nothing worked period.  It was worse than a paperweight because it was too large.  During the Vista fiasco, I recall MS insisting only 50% of the people using it were having problems an that only 500MB of RAM was needed to run it.  When I got it, It took me no time to realize the OS was lousy and all my friends were looking at me for solutions.  You&#039;re talking to a guy who was hard core microsoft all the way and never thought about a Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Lee</title>
		<link>http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-2039</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin Lee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 09:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/#comment-2039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How would you define power user? One that runs a bunch of commands to start windows services as opposed to clicking the button in services under control panel? If that&#039;s your defination of a power user, I&#039;m sorry, I&#039;m not one of them. I did NOT downgrade to XP. It worked fine, and I truly appreciate what UAC attempts to do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would you define power user? One that runs a bunch of commands to start windows services as opposed to clicking the button in services under control panel? If that&#039;s your defination of a power user, I&#039;m sorry, I&#039;m not one of them. I did NOT downgrade to XP. It worked fine, and I truly appreciate what UAC attempts to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Lee</title>
		<link>http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/comment-page-2/#comment-2038</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin Lee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 09:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/#comment-2038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[how would it cut your cost by 40% when mac computers are more expensive than PCs and the licenses for office on mac is more expensive as well? it&#039;s an illusion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how would it cut your cost by 40% when mac computers are more expensive than PCs and the licenses for office on mac is more expensive as well? it&#039;s an illusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/comment-page-2/#comment-2037</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gareth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 08:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/#comment-2037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a Linux user. I have used Windows 7 RC for nearly three months myself. I am still a Linux user. Windows 7, while a VAST, improvement over both XP and Vista is still nowhere near as easy to use or allows as much customisation as my Kubuntu 9.04 installation. In order to get functionality such as an expose feature on Windows 7, where a movement of the mouse to a section of the screen allows you to see all current windows open in a neat tiled interface you can select from requires you to install additional software. Customising the look of Windows 7 is limited to colour and desktop background image. And STILL no multiple desktops which for me is a feature I now cannot live without since moving to Linux.

Don&#039;t feel sorry for Linux users, we are the guys revelling in a hugely more usable and profoundly more advanced operating system while the rest of the world hangs on Microsoft&#039;s every word.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a Linux user. I have used Windows 7 RC for nearly three months myself. I am still a Linux user. Windows 7, while a VAST, improvement over both XP and Vista is still nowhere near as easy to use or allows as much customisation as my Kubuntu 9.04 installation. In order to get functionality such as an expose feature on Windows 7, where a movement of the mouse to a section of the screen allows you to see all current windows open in a neat tiled interface you can select from requires you to install additional software. Customising the look of Windows 7 is limited to colour and desktop background image. And STILL no multiple desktops which for me is a feature I now cannot live without since moving to Linux.</p>
<p>Don&#039;t feel sorry for Linux users, we are the guys revelling in a hugely more usable and profoundly more advanced operating system while the rest of the world hangs on Microsoft&#039;s every word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkeyc</title>
		<link>http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-2036</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[monkeyc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 06:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxgeek.me/2009/06/is-windows-7-the-best-windows-ever/#comment-2036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not really sure what you are trying to say here actually.

For one thing yes OSX is very nice, I am writing this on my MacBook and I buy only mac&#039;s for my home however there is a serious flaw in your argument which always seems to sneak in..

Firstly we have the myth that linux is always simple.  Nope its not, in fact some of the most common OS&#039;es like Ubuntu have serious flaws when you want to go outside of the box - try explaining how to add repositories to your granny.

OSX is also very nice, looks great, works well.. But I support an environment with over 50 OSX servers in it and it suffers from some of the same issues as Windows with other quirks thrown in (the quality of enterprise OSX backup software on the market leaves lots to be desired) as does supporting mac&#039;s in large numbers in a mixed or mac only environment not to mention costly.

Windows7 is going to be sccessful simply because its fast, efficient and its an upgrade from XP corporates will buy.

And its the enterprise world I live in where Windows rules and will continue to rule.  Nope folks despite the best claims we in enterprise IT are not switching to Linux or OSX - unless you count ESX servers as Linux I guess, we are not ditching Windows as out enterprise server platform because there is quite simply nothing out there that offers the maturity, enterprise stability and manageability as Windows and AD - nada.

And there in a nutshell is the reason why Microsoft continues to dominate the market and why Apple has sub 10% global market share - sure you can plug a mac into an AD environment - I do it every day, but to really get functionality you need AdmitMac which isnt cheap and then you have to pay more for most apps and deal with Apple support (ugh) but its worth it - however you still need all that back end and when you have 30&#039;000 users or more you have only one choice.

The obligatory IT professional comment cracks me up because you then proceeded to make the same mistakes yourself - By the way the maxiumum size of an edb file is dependant on which version of exchange you are dealing with and what happens when it fills is also dependant on other factors, so no points there but Id love to hear your thoughts on what you do when you have a MNS cluster fail due to loss of Quorum drive and how to recover from that..

Windows isn&#039;t dead, anyone who thinks that is not an &quot;IT Pro&quot; indeed its not someone even paying attention - market share and mind share will show you its not the case and thats before you look at Gartner&#039;s figures on Enterprise sales and installed seats.  Windows has survived so many death pronouncements by Linux and Apple advocates its not funny, in fact the MS Sucks rubbish became  boring to most of us a decade ago now and we just buy what we like or want.

People who claim tt be IT pro&#039;s always make me smile - Ive spent nearly 200 years in the industry and rarely use the term except sarcastically these days - There&#039;s naught that is proffessional about most IT workers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not really sure what you are trying to say here actually.</p>
<p>For one thing yes OSX is very nice, I am writing this on my MacBook and I buy only mac&#039;s for my home however there is a serious flaw in your argument which always seems to sneak in..</p>
<p>Firstly we have the myth that linux is always simple.  Nope its not, in fact some of the most common OS&#039;es like Ubuntu have serious flaws when you want to go outside of the box &#8211; try explaining how to add repositories to your granny.</p>
<p>OSX is also very nice, looks great, works well.. But I support an environment with over 50 OSX servers in it and it suffers from some of the same issues as Windows with other quirks thrown in (the quality of enterprise OSX backup software on the market leaves lots to be desired) as does supporting mac&#039;s in large numbers in a mixed or mac only environment not to mention costly.</p>
<p>Windows7 is going to be sccessful simply because its fast, efficient and its an upgrade from XP corporates will buy.</p>
<p>And its the enterprise world I live in where Windows rules and will continue to rule.  Nope folks despite the best claims we in enterprise IT are not switching to Linux or OSX &#8211; unless you count ESX servers as Linux I guess, we are not ditching Windows as out enterprise server platform because there is quite simply nothing out there that offers the maturity, enterprise stability and manageability as Windows and AD &#8211; nada.</p>
<p>And there in a nutshell is the reason why Microsoft continues to dominate the market and why Apple has sub 10% global market share &#8211; sure you can plug a mac into an AD environment &#8211; I do it every day, but to really get functionality you need AdmitMac which isnt cheap and then you have to pay more for most apps and deal with Apple support (ugh) but its worth it &#8211; however you still need all that back end and when you have 30&#039;000 users or more you have only one choice.</p>
<p>The obligatory IT professional comment cracks me up because you then proceeded to make the same mistakes yourself &#8211; By the way the maxiumum size of an edb file is dependant on which version of exchange you are dealing with and what happens when it fills is also dependant on other factors, so no points there but Id love to hear your thoughts on what you do when you have a MNS cluster fail due to loss of Quorum drive and how to recover from that..</p>
<p>Windows isn&#039;t dead, anyone who thinks that is not an &quot;IT Pro&quot; indeed its not someone even paying attention &#8211; market share and mind share will show you its not the case and thats before you look at Gartner&#039;s figures on Enterprise sales and installed seats.  Windows has survived so many death pronouncements by Linux and Apple advocates its not funny, in fact the MS Sucks rubbish became  boring to most of us a decade ago now and we just buy what we like or want.</p>
<p>People who claim tt be IT pro&#039;s always make me smile &#8211; Ive spent nearly 200 years in the industry and rarely use the term except sarcastically these days &#8211; There&#039;s naught that is proffessional about most IT workers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

