<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu Tweak: Useful and Easy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tuxgeek.me/2008/11/17/geek-review-ubuntu-tweak-useful-and-easy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tuxgeek.me/2008/11/17/geek-review-ubuntu-tweak-useful-and-easy/</link>
	<description>technology reviews and opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:26:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigbluealien</title>
		<link>http://tuxgeek.me/2008/11/17/geek-review-ubuntu-tweak-useful-and-easy/comment-page-1/#comment-1653</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigbluealien]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxgeek.me/?p=613#comment-1653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with the sources.list editor being poor, but its a new feature so that should get improved.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the sources.list editor being poor, but its a new feature so that should get improved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadim P.</title>
		<link>http://tuxgeek.me/2008/11/17/geek-review-ubuntu-tweak-useful-and-easy/comment-page-1/#comment-1652</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vadim P.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxgeek.me/?p=613#comment-1652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope Ubuntu tweak doesn&#039;t get installed by default, and I found their sources.list editor to be quite... backwards. There is Software Sources already present in System&#8594;Administration that does the job way better than it.

Overwall though, it is a good and well-intentioned project, and seems to be installed on ~4% of ubuntu&#039;s.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Ubuntu tweak doesn&#039;t get installed by default, and I found their sources.list editor to be quite&#8230; backwards. There is Software Sources already present in System&rarr;Administration that does the job way better than it.</p>
<p>Overwall though, it is a good and well-intentioned project, and seems to be installed on ~4% of ubuntu&#039;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigbluealien</title>
		<link>http://tuxgeek.me/2008/11/17/geek-review-ubuntu-tweak-useful-and-easy/comment-page-1/#comment-1651</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigbluealien]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tuxgeek.me/?p=613#comment-1651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m hoping that Ubuntu Tweak gets merged into the main Ubuntu project or at least gets installed by default. It&#039;s always the first thing I install mostly for the Applications section, I used to use Automatix before that project ended but it had a tendency to ruin my install.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m hoping that Ubuntu Tweak gets merged into the main Ubuntu project or at least gets installed by default. It&#039;s always the first thing I install mostly for the Applications section, I used to use Automatix before that project ended but it had a tendency to ruin my install.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

